Eagleionline Partners
Westlaw-Trademark3training.gif
Campus Calendar
Carpool Map

View Larger Map

To add your car e-mail editor Kaiko.Shimura(at)gmail(dot)com.
Search

Recent Comments
Class of 2011 - Special Feature!
facebook.jpg
Admitted students may now register with Eagleionline using their BC.EDU email addresses. To register, click here. Registration gets you hundreds of course outlines, course evaluations and more.
 
If you have not yet joined the Boston College Law School Class of 2011 Facebook page, click the Facebook link above.
 
Check out our “Where Should a BC Law Student Live” post (and summer shuttle bus link).
 
Don’t forget BCLS’s official admitted Student page (and the offical live chat transcript).
 
Finally, take a look at what students are saying about the law school in a feature Eagleionline calls WHY BC?
Login
« Reception Honoring Representative Jamie Eldridge BCLS '00 | Main | US News Considering Factoring Clerkships Into Law School Rankings »
Sunday
18May

Kanstroom to Publish Article on Waterboarding

By Jesse Stellato, May 18, 2008

Eagleionline has obtained a draft of Professor Daniel Kanstroom’s upcoming article: “On ‘Waterboarding’: Legal Interpretation and the Continuing Struggle for Human Rights.” The abstract appears below. Kanstroom is the Director of the Boston College Law School International Human Rights Program, Associate Director of the Boston College Center for Human Rights and International Justice, and Clinical Professor of Law. He teaches Immigration and Refugee Law, International Human Rights Law, and Administrative Law.

 Abstract: While some aspects of the “waterboarding” debate are largely political, the practice also implicates deeply normative underpinnings of human rights and law. Attorney General Michael Mukasey has steadfastly declined to declare waterboarding illegal or to launch an investigation into past waterboarding. His equivocations have generated anguished controversy because they raise a fundamental question: should we balance “heinousness and cruelty” against information that we “might get”? Mr. Mukasey’s approach appears to be careful lawyering. However, it portends a radical and dangerous departure from a fundamental premise of human rights law: the inherent dignity of each person. Although there is some lack of clarity about the precise definition of torture, all is not vagueness, or reliance on “circumstances,” and post hoc judgments. We have clear enough standards to conclude that waterboarding is and was illegal. Official legal equivocation about waterboarding preserves the potential imprimatur of legality for torture. It substitutes a dangerously fluid utilitarian balancing test for the hard-won respect for human dignity at the base of our centuries-old revulsion about torture. That is precisely what the rule of law (and the best lawyers) ought not to do.

Kanstroom’s draft comes on the heels on an earlier essay on the topic of waterboarding, which Eagleionline published on February 12, 2008.

For more information about the debate at Boston College Law School that Attorney General Michael Mukasey’s invitation has spawned, click here. For the Wall Street Journal’s reaction, click here. For a recent student survey on the matter, click here.


Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>