<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:09:51 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>News - Comments</title><link>http://www.eagleionline.com/news/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>James comments on Why did Kerry go to BC?</title><author>James</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:46:57 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.eagleionline.com/news/2008/6/30/why-did-kerry-go-to-bc.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">178512:1708719:comment/1601168</guid><description><![CDATA[MD,<br/><br/>Althouse addressed this answer that originally appeared in the Washington Post:<br/><br/>&quot;ANOTHER UPDATE: A reader (who wasn't happy with my acknowledgment of the hierarchy in the prestige of law schools) referred me to this biographical article about John Kerry that appeared in the Washington Post last week. It gives an explanation for why Kerry went to law school at Boston College. Kerry ran for Congress in the Fall of 1972, when he seemed to be a fast-track golden boy. He was devastated by defeat and:<br/><br/>The law became Kerry's Plan B. The Yale graduate wanted to return there to law school but could not because his wife, Julia, was expecting a baby. His next choice was Harvard, then Boston University, but he applied too late. Boston College offered the opposite of Yale's theoretical approach -- it was famous as a training ground for politicians -- but BC had an opening, and Kerry took it.<br/><br/>So he couldn't go to Yale because Julia was pregnant, but he couldn't go to Harvard because he was late in applying. How do you figure that? Also, one loses a Congressional election in November. That leaves a good two months to apply to any law school. The article describes Kerry as quite devastated by his election loss, and that may have hampered the application process. Schools do have different deadlines (though not before January). [MORE: The dates for taking the LSAT would also be a factor.]&quot;<br/><br/>For additional responses to this post, check out Legal Blog Watch: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2008/06/rehashing-kerry.html">http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2008/06/rehashing-kerry.html</a>]]></description></item><item><title>MD comments on Why did Kerry go to BC?</title><author>MD</author><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:53:28 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.eagleionline.com/news/2008/6/30/why-did-kerry-go-to-bc.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">178512:1708719:comment/1600600</guid><description><![CDATA[James, check out this post in the WSJ's Law Blog:<br/><a rel="nofollow" href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/01/24/kerry-yale-bc-law-to-drop-out-of-2008-race/">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/01/24/kerry-yale-bc-law-to-drop-out-of-2008-race/</a><br/><br/>Kerry's answer, for what it's worth, to your post's question: “‘I had already taken all the law boards,’ Kerry recalled. ‘So I applied to Harvard, Boston University, and Boston College. I was extremely late. Only BC would entertain a late application.’”]]></description></item><item><title>James comments on More Lawyers, Less Jobs?</title><author>James</author><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:45:28 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.eagleionline.com/news/2008/6/20/more-lawyers-less-jobs.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">178512:1708719:comment/1571130</guid><description><![CDATA[An interesting graphic accompanies the AP article in some versions: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2008/06/17/PH2008061700320.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2008/06/17/PH2008061700320.html</a>]]></description></item><item><title>Jake Tabor comments on Where should a BC law student live?</title><author>Jake Tabor</author><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:42:02 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.eagleionline.com/news/2008/3/12/where-should-a-bc-law-student-live.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">178512:1708719:comment/1561132</guid><description><![CDATA[Hi everyone. I'm a rising 3L and my roommate will be moving to NY (he just graduated from BC Law). I live in Brookline (37 Claflin Rd) in a 2 bedroom apartment a couple blocks from Washington Square. The apartment is only a couple of minutes walk from the C line and a 10-15 minute drive to BC Law. I am not sure if I will be able to make it to the housing fair but if anyone is looking for housing and will be in town for the fair, I will be around Friday evening as well as Saturday during the day. Shoot me an email at taborja@bc.edu if you might be interested and would like more info.<br/><br/>Thanks,<br/><br/>Jake]]></description></item><item><title>Dan Roth '04 comments on Mukasey Discusses National Security and the Law</title><author>Dan Roth '04</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 03:15:31 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.eagleionline.com/news/2008/5/24/mukasey-discusses-national-security-and-the-law.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">178512:1708719:comment/1523182</guid><description><![CDATA[Mukasey defends author of so-called torture memos<br/><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/05/23/mukasey_defends_author_of_so_called_torture_memos/?p1=email_to_a_friend">http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/05/23/mukasey_defends_author_of_so_called_torture_memos/?p1=email_to_a_friend</a><br/>By Lara Jakes Jordan<br/>Associated Press Writer / May 23, 2008<br/>WASHINGTON—Attorney General Michael Mukasey is defending former government lawyers who drew up the legal basis of the Bush administration's use of harsh interrogation methods against terror suspects.<br/><br/>Mukasey told Boston College Law School graduates Friday that lawyers doing their part to protect the country in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks should not now be held liable or face criminal charges for doing so.<br/><br/>Mukasey did not mention any specific lawyers by name.<br/><br/>Former Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo is facing at least one civil lawsuit and demands for his firing from Berkeley Law School. Yoo worked in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel from 2001 to 2003.<br/><br/>While there, he wrote several memos legally defending the use of harsh interrogation tactics which are now under criticism by human rights groups and members of Congress. Yoo's memos concluded that President Bush has broad, unfettered wartime authority that cannot be limited by domestic law or international bans on torture.<br/><br/>One memo defined torture, as recognized by U.S. law, as covering &quot;only extreme acts&quot; causing pain similar in intensity to that caused by organ failure or accompanying death.<br/><br/>An internal Justice Department investigation is now considering whether such advice was improper.<br/><br/>At the Friday ceremony, Mukasey lambasted critics seeking to bring lawsuits or charges against the lawyers. &quot;The rhetoric of these discussions is hostile and unforgiving,&quot; Mukasey said in his prepared remarks.<br/><br/>Mukasey's confirmation as attorney general briefly stalled over the issue of waterboarding, an interrogation method simulating drowning that critics call torture. He has since refused to say whether waterboarding is illegal since it is no longer used by the CIA or military interrogators.]]></description></item><item><title>JS comments on Mukasey in Perpective</title><author>JS</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:17:21 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.eagleionline.com/news/2008/2/14/mukasey-in-perpective.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">178512:1708719:comment/1493660</guid><description><![CDATA[Just to supplement James' list of past speakers at BC Law:<br/><br/>1990: John F. Kerry '76 - U.S. Senator, MA<br/><br/>1991: John J. Curtin '57 - President, ABA<br/><br/>1992: Archibald Cox - Professor Emeritus, Harvard<br/><br/>1993: Daniel Coquillette - Dean of Boston College Law School<br/><br/>1994: Carol Moseley-Braun - U.S. Senator, Illinois<br/><br/>1995: Drew S. Days III - Solicitor General of the United States<br/><br/>1996: Deval Patrick, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division<br/><br/>1997: Frank M. Coffin - U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit<br/><br/>1998: Bill Richardson - U.S. Representative to the U.N.<br/><br/>1999: John F. Kerry '76 - U.S. Senator, MA<br/><br/>2000: Elaine Jones - NACP Legal Defense Fund<br/><br/>2001:Margaret Marshall - Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Chief Justice<br/><br/>2002: A. Paul Cellucci, U.S. Ambassador to Canada and former Governor of MA (Double Eagle (BC ‘70, BCLS ‘73))<br/><br/>2003: Stephen Breyer, U.S. Supreme Court Justice<br/><br/>2004: Walter Dellinger, Former Solicitor General of the United States (Aug. ‘96 - Oct. ‘97)<br/><br/>2005: U.S. Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH) (formerly Governor of NH)<br/><br/>2006: Michael S. Greco, President of the American Bar Association (BCLS ‘72)<br/><br/>2007: U.S. Congressman Edward Markey (D-MA) (Double Eagle (BC ‘68, BCLS ‘72)<br/><br/>2008: U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey]]></description></item><item><title>Dan Roth '04 comments on Kerry Kennedy '87 Tells BC Law Alums: "Hold Fast to Your Dreams"</title><author>Dan Roth '04</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:14:23 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.eagleionline.com/news/2008/5/6/kerry-kennedy-87-tells-bc-law-alums-hold-fast-to-your-dreams.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">178512:1708719:comment/1478667</guid><description><![CDATA[I cannot imagine a better role model for the class of 2008.  Perhaps Ms. Kennedy just wasn't available later in May to deliver the Commencement address...  or perhaps Law Day is where we celebrate what BCLS has been, and Commencement bears a message about what we should expect going forth.  ]]></description></item><item><title>Noah comments on Gas Tax Holiday</title><author>Noah</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:56:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.eagleionline.com/news/2008/5/5/gas-tax-holiday.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">178512:1708719:comment/1465401</guid><description><![CDATA[James,<br/><br/>People are dumb. There is no point in even debating the merits of a $1-$2 gas tax, because Obama needs to get elected before he can do anything, and if  he proposes that, he won't win.<br/><br/>]]></description></item><item><title>James comments on Gas Tax Holiday</title><author>James</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:23:40 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.eagleionline.com/news/2008/5/5/gas-tax-holiday.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">178512:1708719:comment/1465025</guid><description><![CDATA[If Obama really wants to be seen as an agent for change, I think he should take the exact opposite stance of McCain and Clinton and propose a tax INCREASE on gasoline.<br/><br/><a rel="nofollow" href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/21/news/international/europe_gas/index.htm">http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/21/news/international/europe_gas/index.htm</a>]]></description></item><item><title>JS comments on Gas Tax Holiday</title><author>JS</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 02:20:56 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.eagleionline.com/news/2008/5/5/gas-tax-holiday.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">178512:1708719:comment/1464476</guid><description><![CDATA[Our politicians should treat the disease, not just the symptoms. The disease is the United States' incredible demand for oil, and its limited supply throughout the world. Any policy that doesn't deal with this basic reality is a smokescreen.<br/><br/>I view this tax holiday proposal as an impermanent policy of political pandering for the purpose of persuading the populace during a primary.]]></description></item></channel></rss>